How to Save Newspapers Part II
In August of 2013 I wrote a blog on how to save newspapers (http://gwrresearch.blogspot.com/2013/08/how-to-save-newspapers.html)
. This blog described the differences between print and digital editions of a
newspaper and their websites. The article focused on creating a symbiotic
relationship between the newspaper and the website.
I see that newspapers are trying to create a business model
that relies on inputs from electronic and print components but I don’t see much
symbiosis. Most of newspaper
efforts still seem to be driven by the old model and its strengths.
News stories are printed in the paper and digital editions
with reference to those stories being repeated in a different format and
different timing on the website. I
saw, in one newspaper, a large photo (half page) of an event with a caption
telling the readers they could learn more about the event on the newspaper’s
website.
Now there is a synergistic effort gone bad. The folks
getting the newspaper don’t get the story and those on the website are reading
what should have been in the newspaper. Newspapers strength is built on great
journalism and great
photojournalism. These are its strengths. The Internet strength is built on
immediacy and audio-video capabilities. The strengths of both platforms were wasted with this effort.
When I was in the newspaper business there was this desire
to also own television stations so its audio-visual capabilities could enhance
coverage and create new revenue streams. Why is it then, that newspapers now have access to a
medium to exploit audio-visual capabilities and fail to use them? In the
example above why not have a great photo (smaller) and a good story with a
reference to a video of the event on the website? This is synergy – using the
strength of both to create something better than either can do alone.
It is symbiotic when each thrives because the other exists. If newspaper editions used their print
model for advertising pricing and an electronic model for website pricing
perhaps there would be a creation of revenue rather than an internal battle
between the website and print sales staffs to move diminishing newspaper
revenues to one platform or the other.
Suppose that a newspaper website had exclusive rights to
live-stream events (yes this means programming expenses) that would be covered
in print and digital editions. The digital editions could have a link to the
web site.
Suppose the print and digital editions used static ads and
the web site used dynamic audio-visual ads (just like television).
I know that newspaper websites use audio-visual capabilities
and the newspaper digital editions link to their websites. What is missing is a
concerted strategy to make both the website and the newspaper editions
successful. Based on what I have seen this is due to separate management teams
for each platform. Advertising sales tries to bundle (which usually results in
inaccurately valuing the strength of each platform) or discount ad buys based
on the number of platforms being used. Content managers work on creating value
for each platform, which, in turn, disallows a collaborative approach to
building a synergistic, symbiotic strategy.
This outcome underscores the newspaper industry’s inability
to understand that the Internet was not and is not a disruptive innovation that
requires two separate organizations. The Internet is a sustaining innovation
that allows industry leaders to better serve their best customers. A sustaining innovation requires one
organization focused on an overarching strategy to create value for customers,
the company and any collaborators.
So here it is, if you want to save newspapers have one
mission – to provide information and entertainment to as large an audience as
possible. This mission should have the vision of:
1)
Using multiple media platforms to create value
for audiences of all sizes,
2)
Create content that has value to audiences and
advertisers,
3)
Manage content to appear on the platform that
provides the best outcome,
4)
Create partnerships with entertainment and
information groups to provide unique experiences for readers and advertisers.
5)
And so on.
Now setting objectives should be somewhat easier and it
should be apparent that all platforms have to be engaged in strategy, tactics
and execution discussions. If all platforms are not engaged in the same
strategy, newspaper organizations will not be successful.
Comments