How To Save Newspapers


Here are some more thoughts on why newspapers may still be a wise investment and how they may find ways to develop a stable of print and digital products that complement each other.

Virtually all newspapers have websites that look good and have great functionality. So why aren't they all producing acceptable amounts of profit? The question probably should be asked differently, "What do consumers and advertisers expect from newspapers?" Then ask, "What do they expect from the Internet?"  The answers are different but there is overlap. The area of overlap is the area of opportunity for creating a business that is needed by consumers and advertisers and capable of creating value that translates into profits.

To determine the real value of the website it is useful to measure the total advertiser dollars spent on a website only ad buy versus those being bundled with a newspaper or distribution ad buy. These stand-alone purchases might give some insight into the job that advertisers are looking for newspaper websites to perform. The amount of money being spent by advertisers on pure website advertising versus the amount of resources being devoted by newspapers to the website might also be useful information.

Newspaper website ventures ought to be competing for Internet dollars, not newspaper dollars. With the amount of resources and talent being put into media web operations, it seems the media should have invented Craig's List, Facebook, LinkedIn or some of the other sites that generate huge amounts of traffic. So, another question, "Are newspapers trying to convert their current business platform to an Internet model?" If so then, "What parts of the model are being considered worthy of conversion?" What parts of the media value created by a local or regional newspaper can be converted to the Internet model and retain real value? If viewers have access to all Internet sites why will they come to a newspaper website?

The Newspaper Business Model Versus The Internet

The key to a newspaper's financial success has been its ability to deliver an audience of dedicated readers (subscribers) to advertisers. This is best when readers are paid subscribers because it is easier to sell an advertiser on the "wantedness" of the product since people are willing to pay for the publication.

It should be noted though that there are niche publications that can command strong advertising commitments without paid subscribers. These publications still have a quantifiable audience that can be delivered to advertisers.

Printed publications have another feature that is attractive, a fixed position in the product. The advertiser's ad is on the same page in all copies of the publication that is delivered to readers.

An additional feature is the serendipity of reading the printed publication. This increases the probability that unintended articles and ads will be read. Unintended readership is valuable to advertisers because it builds awareness that can be capitalized upon when a consumer becomes an active buyer.

Finally, the printed product is delivered periodically to the same household. Thus, advertising in the publication multiple times in different editions increases the probability the ad will be seen through multiple exposures. This ad frequency helps move consumers through the five steps of decision-making (unawareness, awareness, comprehension, conviction and action). 1

So, in summary, print publications are delivered to a definable audience, the ad is certain to reach all readers, the ad is in the same spot in all copies of the product and the publication is delivered to the same group of readers multiple times.

This differs from the current Internet delivery of the news. First, the audience is comprised of individuals that find a site compelling enough to visit. The publisher can't say that a certain number of individuals will receive the news delivered by the Internet. The publisher can only talk about the unique visits to the site and the number of clicks on a story after the fact. That is, it is not delivered by the publisher but is sought by the reader.

Second, a lack of a definable audience requires the publisher's Internet site to compete with all other Internet sites. To drive readers to a particular site is difficult when there are as many as 150,000,000 sites available to anyone with access to the Internet.   Identifying an audience for an advertiser becomes problematic. The number of Internet sites will continue to grow and these sites will find innovative ways to attract audiences. This will continue to fragment the market and make creating specific audiences more difficult.

Third, Internet advertising usually does not have a fixed position for advertisers. Usually the ads rotate. This further amplifies the difficulty to deliver a definable audience to an advertiser. In other words, it is difficult to say that a viewer will see the advertiser's ad because the viewer may not be on line when the ad is rotated into position.           

Fourth, the search mentality of the Internet reduces the serendipity of the reading experience and reduces the probability that unintended articles and ads will be read.

Finally, the lack of an identifiable audience that receives delivery from the publisher makes it more difficult to build advertising frequency, which is valuable to advertisers.

It seems then, the print publication has significant advantages over the Internet for the advertiser even with smaller audiences. The question becomes: How do you compare the cost of advertising between the two mediums? Is the "cost per thousand" is still a good selling metric?

The cost of reaching a print customer should be equal to or less than delivering an Internet reader. The cost of reaching an Internet reader will be much higher when the fragmentation of the audience is coupled with the rotation of the ads. The real metric should be the probability of consistently reaching a reader, which is likely to be more expensive for an Internet reader than a print reader.



Missed Opportunities

Most publications these days have digital editions. The digital newspaper edition is simply the print edition delivered by the Internet. The pages are in the same order and appear exactly like the print product. The product is delivered to subscribers by email. It differs in appearance and functionality from the newspaper web site, which offers rotating ads and delivers news in a different format.

What is surprising is that the digital editions are not robustly marketed. Newspaper marketing seems focused on the print product (decreasingly) and the newspaper’s web site (increasingly).

It seems there are a whole lot of opportunities being missed. Digital editions offer the ability to have in digital form a product that has a definable audience, has ads in a fixed position, allows the serendipity of exposure to unintended ads and articles and can effectively build ad frequency.

The digital edition also offers advantages over the print edition in that subscribers can be offered various sections of the newspaper for different rates. Delivery can be made wherever an email can be received at any time of the day.

Additionally, the digital edition allows counting of emails that are opened which could be a powerful ad sales tool.

Finally, the digital edition allows the ability to launch new sections to digital readers to test the market before investing in or in lieu of the cost of print.

It is up to newspapers to recognize the value of the digital edition and develop a strategy to promote the print + digital product as something different from a newspaper’s website. It is then possible to create new revenue streams and improve the overall profitability of the newspaper organization.

So how do you convert the print model to the Internet? Consider Richard J.V. Johnson's decision to make the Houston Chronicle a morning publication. He started by converting from an afternoon to an all-day newspaper and gradually eliminating the afternoon edition through attrition (this process took twenty years). I think the same approach might be considered for converting a print newspaper to a digital product. The process should be methodical and would take years to accomplish. The bigger question is how to preserve the definable audience that can be delivered to advertisers in the same way the print product does.

            Symbiosis of Print/Digital and the Website

With the explosion of information options and formats presented by digital products there is the improved capability to address more of the information needs of readers. These information needs are the jobs that the media is being hired or asked to do.

There are several approaches to meeting the increasing need for information. One approach says that each type of information need represents a different business opportunity and an individual revenue stream. This argument would suggest that a newspaper have a different business model for the print, digital and website products. This approach is likely to minimize the ability to broadly address the information needs of the audience and the advertising needs of the sponsors.

Consider the model that has a symbiotic relationship between the website and the print/digital editions. The website would be relegated to doing what it does best – provide immediate access to events unfolding in the present and access of immense amounts of data to answer specific questions. The print/digital editions would do what they do best – in-depth news coverage, editing and packaging of news and features and a static product for a specific period of time (an edition stays in the same form for about twenty four hours).

The symbiotic relationship allows the creation of a seamless business model that can employ the revenue building strengths of each product. As news happens it could appear on the website and then be moved to the print/digital edition when it is published. When news is published in the print/digital edition it could be removed from the website.  Both the website and the digital edition could have links to archives.

The symbiotic relationship allows the creation and magnification of revenue streams. For web users wanting information that has shifted to the print/digital edition there are subscriber opportunities (web users might be provided free access for a period of time then be asked to subscribe).  The website would be a source of building the subscriber base for the print/digital edition. For print/digital users the website provides current news and answers to specific questions on a broad array of topics.

The website provides the option to sell rotating banners or even static banners for specific time slots. The print/digital edition offers the ability to provide an ad to an audience of subscribers in a static product. The digital edition allows better delivery options than does the print and the print product still has the portability and dedicated audience advantages.

Creating a symbiotic relationship will require all products to fall under one marketing strategy. Getting the currently competing entities to fall under one strategy may be the most difficult hurdle for the newspaper. It may be difficult for each to recognize they play a smaller role in a larger overall strategy.

In summary, the printed newspaper has advantages for readers and advertisers that are different from an Internet website and the digital newspaper edition has delivery options that are different and superior to the print product.

By developing a symbiotic relationship between the print and digital editions and the website, newspapers have the ability to create audiences that can be delivered to advertisers. These audiences can become loyal consumers of newspaper products.

Answering the questions and taking the steps above start down the road of converting to a digital business. It will be some time before electronic displaces print. But if that is to take place shouldn't it be newspapers that drive the transformation?





1 Roger Wimmer, The Five Stages of Communication/Persuasion.

Comments

Brent White said…
Great article, very detailed and makes some great points. What you didn't talk about however was the physical aspects and costs of delivering a hard copy newspaper in a time when labor costs are on a constant rise. I'd be interested in hearing your take on this aspect of the issue.
Brent White
www.GigitalMarketing.com
Gigs for Online Marketing
Gary Randazzo said…
Brent,

It is true that paper and ink and labor cost money. If however the cost is less than the value provided to advertisers then a profit is generated. When a profit ceases to exist then the readers and advertisers have determined the rates being charged by the newspaper and the value they receive isn't worth the cost.

This may make a case for a more rapid shift to a digital product.
ByWayHyWays said…
"... probably should be..."
well, should it or shouldn't it?

We have, print, for too long been solely driven by the desires of those who are not part of the 4th estate. Namely the advertisers who DO influence what we cover, what we write about and when.

We lost our sense of meaning when the paper allowed itself to be driven --soley--by the whim of the advertisers.

I am all for pleasing the advertising customer; but when we became the advertising industry's whore - we lost the respect of the communities we serve(d).

When I was a child; my town had 2x a day editions of one newspaper and another daily newspaper (and a darned good one too) competing against it for its daily audience.

When profits became the almighty-- that town lost all competition buying its competitor's presses and firing its staff without notice.

Now there is only ONE daily that is, effectually, an advertising sheet.

It wasn't the Internet that killed journalism, it were ourselves.
Gary Randazzo said…
I worked for a newspaper that had a morning and evening edition early in my career. We made the decision to eliminate the evening paper because of the nature of the market. People wanted to read the paper before going to work rather than in the evening. Evening papers all over the country found themselves in the same situation. In Houston, the Chronicle shifted from an afternoon newspaper to a morning newspaper. At the time the Houston Post was a morning newspaper. According to Dick Johnson, the Chronicle publisher that orchestrated the move to a morning paper, the Chronicle would have lost the market if it had remained an evening newspaper.

As far as advertisers go, I worked at newspapers where the line between business and editorial was strictly enforced. Both sides understood the value of an independent news staff. Since I was on the business side I did witness the loss of some Million dollar+ contracts due to some news stories not being well received by the advertisers. Dick Johnson told me the story (which was documented) that when one advertiser threatened to pull his ads due to an unfavorable news story, Dick responded by saying that if they pulled the advertising they would never be allowed back into the newspaper. The advertiser backed down. This speaks to the value of newspaper advertising at the time.

Finally RIchard T. Schlosberg III, my first boss said "The most important freedom is freedom of the press because it protects all of our other freedoms but to be a free press it must be a profitable press otherwise it will be subsidized and become a controlled media." Thus advertisers are not the villains, they are the folks that allow our readers the ability to receive the newspaper at a reasonable cost and allow newspapers to operate as the Fourth Estate. Finally, advertiser are also readers.
John Doe said…
Gary,
You are naive to think advertisers have never influenced editoral.In the 80's and 90's I worked for the Houston Chronicle's number one advertiser, in their advertising department.I witnessed unfavorable stories about my company-million dollar lawsuits (3)-and what should have been page one stories were buried deep in the publication, short and sweet with benign headlines. By the way they got unfavorable judgements in all three cases.
What I remember most about you is how you single handedly put ADVO virtually out of business here in Houston.
Cheers!
Gary Randazzo said…
John,

There is no question that key advertisers had influence. But it was not through the business side of the newspaper business. Many businesses have individuals in their organization to manage their public relations and affairs. Some of those folks are incredibly effective and have close relationships with editors and writers. I see this is a two way street, the editors and writers need to cultivate relationships to be on the receiving end of exclusive news tips.

I think this is part of business and doesn't indicate the press is dominated or controlled by key advertisers. I am not certain of which instances you are describing but my guess is they did not present a significant danger to the public or their well being.

I am glad I am remembered for something. I hope all is well with you.

Popular posts from this blog

10 Considerations for Pricing a Product or Service

What Role Does Pricing Play in Strategic Marketing?

A way to Classify Customers to Clarify Marketing Strategy