The Discussion About Tariffs
I will interrupt my discussion on MVOSSTE and AI to create a new business to discuss an area that should be given a great deal of attention.
The current White House administration is using tariffs to "make America wealthy again" and to insure our national security.
Regarding making America wealthy again, it should be noted the U.S. is the wealthiest nation on earth and that it has about 30% of the world's wealth and less than 5% of the world's population. It should be noted that in 1960 the U.S. had 40% of the world's wealth and its share has declined. This decline, however, is not due to the U.S. economy shrinking it is due to economies in the rest of the world expanding at a faster rate than the U.S. This makes sense since smaller economies can double in size and still be very small when compared to the U.S.
Back in the 1960s the advanced economies recognized it was important to help third world countries grow their economies so they could provide their citizens with an acceptable standard of living. The U.S. led the way by providing support and access to the U.S. market. There were benefits for U.S. companies and building the U.S. role as a world leader. I think these benefits will endure as long as the U.S. continues its leadership role.
Now regarding the need to insure national security. Part of our security is knowing that we have allies that support our worldwide leadership and allow us to have military establishments in their countries. It is true however that certain industries need to be kept in the U.S. because they insure our security needs and allow the U.S. to be leaders in critical industries. Keeping these industries in the U.S. also allows them to have easy access to U.S. research universities which are the envy of the world.
Now speaking as a manager, it seems it would be important to consider all approaches to address these concerns. As I point out in my MVOSSTE framework it is important to be methodical and consider all alternatives in order to increase the probability of having an optimal solution.
Consider using tariffs as the major tool to achieve the afore stated objectives. One cannot reasonably expect other countries to simply accept new, higher U.S. tariffs and reduce their economy so that America can get wealthier. The likely outcome would be retaliatory tariffs and those tariffed countries finding new trading partners that might not be in the best interest of the U.S.
Neither can the U.S. expect that tariffs on certain industries will prevent other countries from developing these industries.
So the question is, "are there alternatives solutions that use other tools including tariffs to achieve these goals?" Since I believe AI can be used as a tool, I asked it that question regarding national security and it provided this response:
To deter industries vital to national security from offshoring purely for cost efficiencies, a nation can use a mix of policy, financial, and regulatory tools. Here’s a structured list of approaches, grouped for clarity:
1. Financial Incentives (Carrots)
Tax Breaks/Subsidies: Offer tax credits, deductions, or direct subsidies for companies that produce domestically.
Grants & R&D Funding: Provide funding for innovation and modernization to help offset higher domestic production costs.
Loan Guarantees or Low-Interest Loans: Make capital investment more affordable for domestic operations.
2. Regulatory Requirements (Sticks)
National Security Regulations: Impose restrictions or reviews (e.g., CFIUS in the U.S.) on foreign investment or offshoring in sensitive sectors like semiconductors, defense, energy, or critical infrastructure.
“Buy National” Mandates: Require government procurement to favor domestic suppliers for critical goods.
Export Controls & Licensing: Limit the ability to export production or technology related to sensitive industries.
3. Strategic Stockpiling & Domestic Procurement
Strategic Reserves: Build and maintain stockpiles of critical goods (e.g., medical supplies, rare earth elements).
Government Contracts: Use long-term contracts to guarantee demand for domestically produced goods.
4. Infrastructure and Workforce Development
Invest in Specialized Infrastructure: Create or upgrade facilities like industrial parks or logistics hubs to support targeted sectors.
Workforce Training Programs: Fund technical training and upskilling to ensure a competitive domestic labor pool.
5. Trade Policy Tools
Tariffs on Imported Equivalents: Use tariffs selectively to level the cost playing field for goods produced abroad.
Anti-Dumping Measures: Enforce trade rules to prevent unfair pricing by foreign producers.
Local Content Requirements: Mandate a certain percentage of components or labor must be domestic.
6. Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs)
Foster collaboration between government and key industries to share risk and ensure alignment on strategic goals (e.g., CHIPS and Science Act in the U.S. for semiconductors).
7. Transparency and Risk Disclosure
Disclosure Requirements: Mandate companies disclose the national security risks of offshoring certain production capabilities.
Risk Assessments: Require scenario planning or security risk disclosures to boards/shareholders.
Examples
United States: The Defense Production Act, Inflation Reduction Act, and CHIPS Act are modern examples of these tools in action.
Japan: Provides subsidies to companies relocating critical manufacturing from China to Japan.
EU: Uses “strategic autonomy” policy to keep pharmaceutical and energy sectors within the bloc.
It seems the Biden administration was using the whole tool box including keeping some tariffs from the preceding administration.
To increase both U.S. economic strength and national security, the best approach is a strategically balanced, long-term industrial and innovation policy. Here’s a summary of the most effective levers, combining economic growthwith resilience and national defense goals.
🧭 Strategic Objective:
Strengthen U.S. economic competitiveness while ensuring the nation's strategic independence in critical sectors.
🔧 Best Approaches
1. Invest in Critical Industries (Economic Base & Security Backbone)
Semiconductors, AI, biotechnology, rare earths, advanced manufacturing, energy independence (especially nuclear and renewables).
Use public investment (e.g., CHIPS Act-style programs) to attract private capital.
Prioritize reshoring or “friend-shoring” of supply chains in these sectors.
2. Modernize Infrastructure
Invest in transportation, digital networks (5G/6G), broadband, and smart grids.
Ensures economic fluidity, rapid military logistics, and resilience against cyber or physical attacks.
3. Drive Innovation & R&D
Increase federal funding for basic and applied research, especially via:
NSF, NIH, ARPA-H, DARPA, and DoE labs.
Public-private partnerships with universities and tech hubs.
Promote commercialization of new technologies domestically.
4. Secure Talent & Workforce Development
National STEM and skilled-trades workforce strategy.
Align education policy with critical industry needs.
Immigration reforms to attract and retain top global talent in science, engineering, and cybersecurity.
5. Strengthen Strategic Trade Policy
Pursue smart tariffs, export controls, and trade alliances to protect key sectors and gain market access for U.S. goods.
Use trade rules to defend against unfair practices (IP theft, state-owned enterprises).
6. Build National Stockpiles and Resilience
Create or expand national reserves of essential materials (e.g., medical supplies, rare earths, food, fuel).
Diversify sources and increase domestic capacity for strategic goods.
7. Encourage Responsible Corporate Behavior
Incentivize domestic investment with:
Tax credits for U.S.-based R&D and production.
Penalties for offshoring critical capabilities.
ESG metrics that include national interest benchmarks.
8. Expand Defense Industrial Base
Strengthen supply chains for weapons systems, munitions, aerospace, and space capabilities.
Support dual-use technologies that benefit both civilian and military applications.
📈 Long-Term Impacts
Policy Lever | Economic Impact | Security Impact |
---|---|---|
Infrastructure | Job creation, productivity | Resilience, mobility |
Innovation | Global competitiveness | Tech edge in warfare |
Talent | High-wage economy | Cyber and AI readiness |
Industry | Supply chain strength | Independence from rivals |
Trade | Balanced global strategy | Protection from manipulation |
I encourage anyone reading this post to consider all of the factors that affect our economy and security, do the research, find the facts and then decide what you would do. My guess is that you wouldn't rely so heavily on tariffs.
Comments
We do know that we can’t currently compete with some countries because of their lax labor laws and lax adherence to patent laws. We have come to rely and benefit from these and have paid for it with our ability to manufacture on our own. The only protected manufacturing base is in defense, which is nice, but not enough.
‘Smart’ tariffs (I don’t know what those are, but probably more diplomatic than our current version) would not require a government to tax and choose which industry will dominate, but put America on an equal footing by softening the advantage of cheap labor and lax patent enforcement. Another roundabout method might be to not allow manufacturers who mistreat their workers, excessively pollute, or abuse patents to sell in the US, which I think would be a harsher blow to some of our competition. It would also serve as a wake up call to our casual consumerism.
I would favor a fully free-market solution, but I also see the strategic need for the U.S. to be self-sustainable. The proposed solutions are reasonable, but I think the market will move faster than our experts can invest. If the playing field is level, America will have a better chance at success than relying on subsidies and targeted restrictions.
The CHIPs act provides significant incentives and funding for domestic chip production. While it can't predict the types of chips that will be needed it would encourage chip makers who will lead the research into new chip to locate their operations in the U.S.