Using Consumer Adoption Drivers to Determine Marketing Strategy
Defining Potential Actions
Having
the right offerings that best meets the market needs at a price that is
acceptable to customers and provides profitable cash flows for the organization
requires a well thought out product assessment process.
It is
important to include a complete description of the product and the alternatives
used in the comparison. The product description should include all tangible and
intangible characteristics. Tangible characteristics would include size,
weight, and other physical properties of the product. Intangible
characteristics would include guarantees, customer service, and ease of
understanding how to use the product or product training and so on.
While
tangible and intangible characteristics may be hard to capture it is an
important exercise from the view of the customer. It helps understand the real
job the customer has hired the company and its products to do.
Clayton
Christensen gives the example of milk shakes being used in the morning as a
breakfast substitute for people on their drive to work and in the afternoon as
a reward mothers gave to their children after school. In his example the milk
shake had been “hired” to do two different jobs by two different customer
groups. Clearly price alone could not describe the different jobs the product
was “hired” to do nor could it describe the value of the product to either
group. In the case of milk shakes characteristics that would need to be
included would be the availability of the product (this would fall under “search
time intensity” below).
To help
describe product characteristics it may useful to consider the potential
actions to be taken in light of several “Consumer Adoption Drivers” (CAD) that we developed at GWR Research.
1)
Group Influence Intensity –
relates to peer pressure exerted on customers
2)
Perish ability – the length of
time the product is deemed useful,
3)
Psychological appeal – status
associated with the product
4)
Price sensitivity – the need
for the customer to budget for the purchase,
5)
Relative Price Influence – the
attractiveness of other products as a substitute when price is a consideration,
6)
Frequency of Purchase – The
frequency with which the customer purchases the product,
7)
Search Time Intensity – the
amount of time invested in the search for the “right” product,
8)
Tangible Differentiability –
physical differences between products,
9)
Intangible differentiability –
non-physical differences between products (guarantees, relationships with
company, branding etc.),
10)Technical Complexity – the need for training before a
customer can use the product. This may be a factor in determining the type of
sales force that will be required.
The
table below arranges each dimension next to a semantic differential. Using a
fairly simple research survey, customers can rank the dimensions as being of
high, low or no importance. Analysts can use questions that elicit responses
for each CAD descriptor.1
Dimension
|
High
|
Low
|
None
|
Group
Influence Intensity
|
|
|
|
Perish
ability
|
|
|
|
Psychological
Appeal
|
|
|
|
Price
Sensitivity
|
|
|
|
Relative
Price Influence
|
|
|
|
Frequency
of Purchase
|
|
|
|
Search
Time Intensity
|
|
|
|
Tangible
Differentiability
|
|
|
|
Intangible
Differentiability
|
|
|
|
Technical
Complexity
|
|
|
|
Customer Survey Process
Using
focus groups to get a qualitative feel may provide a good start to identifying
customer groups according to CAD.
For
critical strategic decisions customer groups should be large enough to provide
results with a high level of statistical confidence. The Key customer and
Under-Potential customer categories may require a census to provide
statistically significant findings. Nonuser categories are likely large enough
to use random sampling techniques.
Comments